The relationship between the basal coronary translesional pressure gradient and fractional flow reserve

Aim

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) allows for physiological definition of coronary lesion severity but requires induction of maximal coronary circulation hyperemia with administration of adenosine leading to coronary resistive vessel vasodilatation. However, the hyperemic response to adenosine, and therefore the calculation of FFR, may be affected by dysfunction of the coronary microvasculature. The aim was to define the relationship between basal P_d/P_a and FFR and identify lesion-independent predictors of the change in P_d/P_a with hyperemia.

Methods and Results

One hundred and sixty-six consecutive patients undergoing FFR measurement were prospectively enrolled (mean age 62.6 ± 10.3 years, 27% females). Basal P_d/P_a, FFR, and delta P_d/P_a (difference between basal P_d/P_a and FFR) were recorded. Independent predictors of delta P_d/P_a included angiographic lesion severity, lesion length, gender, body mass index, and total cholesterol:HDL cholesterol ratio. The best basal P_d/P_a cutoff value to predict lesion physiological significance was 0.87 (positive predictive value of 100% for an FFR value ≤0.80) and the best cutoff for nonsignificance was 0.93 (negative predictive value of 98% for an FFR value >0.80).

Conclusion

The delta P_d/P_a may be affected by patient gender, body mass index, and cholesterol profile. A basal P_d/P_a value of ≥0.93 is highly predictive of an FFR >0.80. Conversely, a basal P_d/P_a value of ≤0.87 is highly predictive of an FFR ≤0.80. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

from # All Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2tYphP0
via IFTTT