Clinical Evidence for Regenerative Endodontic Procedures: Immediate versus Delayed Induction?

Clinicians face many challenges when treating immature permanent teeth in young patients. Immediate blood clot induction can be a successful option as described by some case reports. No experimental studies or clinical trials have addressed this question. We have designed a clinical trial in which we hypothesized that there is no difference in success between immediate or delayed induction protocols. After confirmation of pulpal necrosis, patients were randomized. In the delayed group, 15 teeth were treated following the American Association of Endodontists guidelines, and calcium hydroxide was used as the intracanal medication.

from ! ORL Sfakianakis via paythelady.61 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2xxubDR
via IFTTT