This review comparing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional radiography (CR) for localising impacted canines included 8 mainly cross-sectional studies and suggests that CBCT is more accurate. However the quality of the studies is low and further research is needed.
The post Impacted canines: localisation with conventional or cone beam radiographs? appeared first on National Elf Service.
from ! ORL Sfakianakis via paythelady.61 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2xpBd1p
via IFTTT
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182,00306932607174,alsfakia@gmail.com,