Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users Via Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Abstract Most cochlear implants encode the fundamental frequency of periodic sounds by amplitude modulation of constant-rate pulsatile stimulation. Pitch perception provided by such stimulation strategies is markedly poor. Two experiments are reported here that consider potential advantages of pulse rate compared to modulation frequency for providing stimulation timing cues for pitch. The first experiment examines beat frequency distortion that occurs when modulating constant-rate pulsatile stimulation. This distortion has been reported on previously, but the results presented here indicate that distortion occurs for higher stimulation rates than previously reported. The second experiment examines pitch resolution as provided by pulse rate compared to modulation frequency. The results indicate that pitch discrimination is better with pulse rate than with modulation frequency. The advantage was large for rates near what has been suggested as the upper limit of temporal pit ch perception conveyed by cochlear implants. The results are relevant to sound processing design for cochlear implants particularly for algorithms that encode fundamental frequency into deep envelope modulations or into precisely timed pulsatile stimulation. View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.