Cancers, Vol. 12, Pages 3375: The Prognostic Role of the Surgical Margins in Squamous Vulvar Cancer: A Retrospective Australian Study

Alexandros G.Sfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader Cancers, Vol. 12, Pages 3375: The Prognostic Role of the Surgical Margins in Squamous Vulvar Cancer: A Retrospective Australian Study Μέσω Cancers Cancers, Vol. 12, Pages 3375: The Prognostic Role of the Surgical Margins in Squamous Vulvar Cancer: A Retrospective Australian Study Cancers doi: 10.3390/cancers12113375 Authors: Barlow Jackson Hacker For the last 30 years at the Royal Hospital for Women, unifocal vulvar squamous cancers have been treated by radical local excision, aiming to achieve a histopathological margin of ≥8 mm, equating to a surgical margin of 1 cm. The need for a margin of this width has recently been challenged. We aimed to determine the long-term outcome following this conservative approach, and the relationship between vulvar recurrences and surgical margins. Data were obtained retrospectively on 345 patients treated primarily with surgery for squamous vulvar cancer between 1987 and 2017. Median follow-up was 93 months. Five-year disease-specific survival was 86%. Of 78 vulvar recurrences, 33 (42.3%) were at the primary site and 45 (57.7%) at a remote site. In multivariable analysis, a margin <5 mm showed a higher risk of all vulvar (Hazard ratio (HR), 2.29; CI, 1.12−4.70), and primary site recurrences (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR), 15.20; CI, 5.21−44.26), w hile those with a margin of 5 to <8 mm had a higher risk of a primary site recurrence (SHR, 8.92; CI, 3.26−24.43), and a lower risk of remote site recurrence. Excision margins <8 mm treated by re-excision or radiation therapy had a significantly decreased risk of recurrence. Guidelines should continue to recommend a surgical margin of 1 cm. View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.