Association Between Human Papilloma Virus Infection and Malignant Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma

xloma.fota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader Association Between Human Papilloma Virus Infection and Malignant Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma Via The Laryngoscope Objective This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of malignant sinonasal inverted papilloma (SNIP) according to the type of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. Methods The databases of PubMed, EmBase, and Web of Science were searched for studies that reported the risk of malignant SNIP in patients infected by specific types of HPV. The quantitative analyses for pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results Twenty‐six molecular epidemiological studies that recruited a total of 900 patients with SNIP were selected for the final meta‐analysis. The summary ORs indicated that HPV‐6 (OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 0.47–8.61; P = .343), HPV‐11 (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.26–2.89; P = .806), and HPV‐6/11 (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.59–3.53; P = .426) infections were not associated with the risk of malignant SNIP. However, the risk of malignant SNIP was increased in patients infected with HPV‐16 (OR: 8.51; 95% CI: 3.36–21.59; P < .001), HPV‐11/16 (OR: 7.95; 95% CI: 1.13–56.01; P = .038), HPV‐18 (OR: 23.26; 95% CI: 5.27–102.73; P < .001), and HPV‐16/18 (OR: 24.34; 95% CI: 5.74–103.18; P < .001). Conclusions This study found that patients infected with HPV types 16, 11/16, 18, and 16/18 were associated with an increased risk of malignant SNIP. However, patients infected with HPV types 6, 11, and 6/11 did not have a significant risk of malignant SNIP. Laryngoscope, 2020 View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.