Comparison of Abdominal Computed Tomographic Enhancement and Organ Lesion Depiction Between Weight-Based Scanner Software Contrast Dosing and a Fixed-Dose Protocol in a Tertiary Care Oncologic Center

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the quality of enhancement and solid-organ lesion depiction using weight-based intravenous (IV) contrast dosing calculated by injector software versus fixed IV contrast dose in oncologic abdominal computed tomographic (CT) examinations. Methods This institutional review board–exempt retrospective cohort study included 134 patients who underwent single-phase abdominal CT before and after implementation of weight-based IV contrast injector software. Patient weight, height, body mass index, and body surface area were determined. Two radiologists qualitatively assessed examinations (4 indicating markedly superior to −4 indicating markedly inferior), and Hounsfield unit measurements were performed. Results Enhancement (estimated mean, −0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.19 to 0.09; P = 0.46) and lesion depiction (estimated mean, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.10 to 0.07; P = 0.79) scores did not differ between CT examinations using weight-based IV contrast versus fixed IV contrast dosing when a minimum of 38.5 g of iodine was used. However, the scores using weight-based IV contrast dosing were lower when the injector software calculated and delivered less than 38.5 g of iodine (estimated mean, −0.81; 95% CI, −1.06 to −0.56; P

from A via a.sfakia on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2CIAeto