Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

Δευτέρα 24 Μαΐου 2021

Analysis of patient- and procedure-related risk factors for nasal septal perforations following septoplasty

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06887-2. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the possible relationship between various predictive factors (patient or surgery related) and the development of nasal septal perforations (NSP) with the help of a large study group.

METHODS: One hundred and forty-three patients were included in the study. The presence of the following factors was evaluated and compared between the NSP and healthy group: types of surgeries, presence of unilateral or bilateral mucosal tears, concomitant inferior turbinate interventions, smoking, accompanying diabetes mellitus (DM) or allergic rhinitis (AR), types of nasal packings, duration of the surgery (minutes), and the experience of the surgeon (senior/junior). Nasal septal deviations were grouped into two: simple cartilage crests at the septum base and other-more complicated-deviations.

RESULTS: NSP was detecte d in six (4.2%) patients after a mean follow-up of 9.3 ± 3.7 (min: 6 max: 14) months. None of these patients suffered from (AR) or DM. Four of these patients had unilateral and one patient had bilateral mucosal tears during the surgeries. None of the above-mentioned factors-including mucosal tears, type of the deviation or experience of the surgeon-had a significant effect on NSP.

CONCLUSION: Untreated bilateral corresponding mucosal tears are the main cause of NSP. When immediately repaired, unilateral or bilateral tears do not affect the development of NSP significantly. Patient-related factors such as age, DM, smoking, AR, and procedure-related factors such as duration, the complexity of the septal deviation, type of the nasal packing, and experience of the surgeon also do not have a significant effect on NSP.

PMID:34028581 | DOI:10.1007/s00405-021-06887-2

View on the web

Learning curve and technical nuances of endoscopic skull base reconstruction with nasoseptal flap to control high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leakage: reconstruction after endoscopic skull base surgery other than pituitary surgery

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06877-4. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although reconstruction techniques after endoscopic skull base surgery have been improved, there are difficulties in reconstructing the skull base with a nasoseptal flap (NSF), especially in the case of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors for the development of postoperative CSF leaks in terms of less experienced surgeon practices.

METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records was performed for 125 patients who underwent endoscopic skull base surgery for intradural pathology with intraoperative high-flow CSF leakage between Oct 2012 and Apr 2017. Basic demographic data were collected, including body mass index (BMI), tumor pathology, comorbidities, and outcomes. To assess the learning curve effect, patients were divided into early cohort (n = 30) and late coho rt (n = 95) groups.

RESULTS: Overall postoperative CSF leakage was 10.4% (13/125) in this series. There were no significant risk factors for postoperative CSF leakage among the demographic data including BMI, comorbidities, or radiation history. Postoperative CSF leakage was most prevalent in the transclival approach than in other approaches, but the difference was not statistically significant (20.8%, p = 0.351). When dividing the results by timetable, the patients who underwent skull base reconstruction in the early cohort experienced more postoperative CSF leakage (23.3%, 7 cases out of 30) than in the late cohort (6.3%, 6 cases out of 95, p = 0.014). The learning curve was steeper in the early cohort (30 early cases 23.3%, 31-60 10%, 61-90 6.7%, 91-125 2.9%).

CONCLUSIONS: To improve the success rate of endoscopic skull base reconstruction, surgeons have to keep the basic technical details in mind to reduce the learning curve.

PMID:34028580 | DOI:10.1007/s00405-021-06877-4

View on the web

Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and macrophages in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06879-2. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Many studies have investigated the prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor-infiltrating macrophages (TIMs) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the results remain controversial. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of TILs/TIMs in patients with NPC METHODS: The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021234078). PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched up to Dec 30, 2020. We reviewed studies that evaluated the relationship between TILs/TIMs and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), or progression-free survival (PFS) in NPC. For TILs, CD3, CD4, CD8, and FOXP3 were searched as T-cell markers, CD19 and CD20 as B-cell markers, and CD56 as a natural killer cell marker. For TIMs, CD68 and CD163 were searched as total and M2 macrophage markers, respectively.

RESULTS: In total, 19 studies with 3708 NPC were included in this meta-analysis. We found that high total numbers of TILs were significantly associated with favorable OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.57 and PFS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.38-0.62)]. In contrast, tumor infiltration by CD3+ T cells (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39-0.76), CD4+ T cells (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.85), and CD8+ T cells (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.93) correlated positively with OS. No significant relationship was found between survival and tumor infiltration by FOXP3+ T cells, CD68+ macrophages, or CD163+ macrophages.

CONCLUSION: Our findings revealed that tumor infiltration by CD3+ , CD4+ , and CD8+ T cells could be prognostic biomarkers in NPC.

PMID:34027599 | DOI:10.1007/s00405-021-06879-2

View on the web

Αναζήτηση αυτού του ιστολογίου

! # Ola via Alexandros G.Sfakianakis on Inoreader